Skip to content ↓


The Responsibility Project®. Exploring what it means to do the right thing

Friday Feb 10


Uncle Sam Goes Green

2 Comments

August 2, 2010 by Greg Lindsay for Fast Company

Uncle Sam Goes Green

By now you’ve heard plenty about smarter cities and even a “decade of smart,” but what about a smarter courthouse? Or a smarter federal building?

Despite the flurry of deals signed by cities and even non-profits with the likes of IBM and Cisco (which announced a new pilot project around Akron, Ohio this week), the biggest score in the smarter sweepstakes is a government agency you’ve likely never heard of, the General Services Administration, and its real estate arm, the Public Buildings Service. The PBS is the federal government’s landlord and superintendent, charging rent, making repairs, and otherwise doing the utmost to cover its $8.6 billion annual budget and return a profit to Congress. It’s also been charged with going green in a big way -- meaning it will have to retrofit and smarten up its aging buildings.

It won’t be cheap.

The PBS owns or leases 9,600 buildings across all 50 states, totaling enough square footage to fill every office building in Manhattan below Central Park. At the Realcomm “connected real estate” conference in Las Vegas last month, PBS officials were the belles of the ball, courted ardently by tech heavyweights and niche players alike as a potential gusher of contracts. They announced the PBS would become a “green proving ground” for smarter buildings, using its clout and its cash to make the technology companies play nice and create interoperable standards. They hoped to kick broad adoption into high gear. “This isn’t just the flavor of the month; this isn’t just a pilot,” GSA assistant commissioner Larry Melton told me afterwards. “This is the future of facilities, really. We have the ability to change the platform.”

He doesn’t have much choice. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, coupled with Executive Orders issued by President Obama, dictate the GSA cut its energy use by 30% (compared to 2003 levels) by 2015. The agency has responded by targeting the 200 worst offenders for total overhauls -- buildings like the Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building in Portland, Oregon, which is scheduled to undergo a $133 million retrofit that will essentially rebuild it from the inside out. The new enhancements include a fiber backbone for the entire building, and networked smart meters, HVAC, and lighting controls.

“But to hit that 30% target, we need to change behavior, too,” said Frank Santella, the agency’s director of smart buildings. In an experiment that would make Cass Sunstein proud, the PBS is working with designers at IDEO and researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to install a giant screen in the lobby of the San Francisco Federal Building displaying its real-time levels of energy use. The assumption is that if you give people the information, they’ll take steps to rein in their consumption. “We want to see if we can change the behavior of people,” Santella said. Down the road, he hopes to stick a widget on employees’ screens depicting their personal usage. “We want to bring this down to human scale.”

In addition to the 200 buildings slated for gut renovation, by the end of the year another 50 will be identified for outfitting with simpler measures such smart meters and stand-alone applications. But the long-term vision is to link all 9,600 buildings on a single network, with regional command centers controlling energy output and a national one “spotting trends and opportunities and writing policies around them,” as Melton put it. It would be the prototype for the nation-wide smart grid touted by everyone from GE to IBM to Google -- although the agency isn’t about to hand over the keys to just one. “We’re trying to test as many different technologies as possible,” Melton said. “Our strategy isn’t to buy one, walk away and let it run. Others have done that, and let’s just say they didn’t work so well. Initially, a lot of companies were surprised by this, but considering we have an inventory of 360 million square feet, we have the ability to be leading customers.”

In practice, this means being able to dictate the terms: open protocols; nothing proprietary; seamless interoperability, and shared data. “We’re looking for the total solution, not just someone to sell us the middleware boxes, but also the analytics and the engineering,” said Santella, all of which means no one can go it alone. The result is that practical partnerships are starting to form, rather than everyone touting their own technology as the only one you’ll ever need.

“We know the technology is changing, and we’re making the case for change,” said Melton. “A lot of people think we’re this big bureaucratic arm, but we’re really no different than the private sector other than the fact we work for the government. We knew we had to be a leader in this -- we feel like we’re making the market.”


Share this short URL /// http://sharerp.com/j5

 


2 Comments

What do you think? Leave a comment

  • August 4, 2010 by InnodyJoymn

    If you have a plan to visit Poland you have to see our site where you will find the best places in Poland. Poland it's a beautifull country aspecialy small villages near the sea. We present the best places you have to sea if you are in Poland.

    Country sitemap

    Best regards Martin rozwoj

    Reply

  • August 22, 2010 by Chris

    Oh great another bureaucracy do we really know what these agencies are doing and how they are spending our money? It worries me that we have so many and we have so very little control of what they do.

    How many people know that it is our bureaucrats that write and intemperate the administrative codes, or to put it more in laymen terms enforce the laws voted on by law makers.

    Bureaucrats prefer to keep this on the down low but governments from the time of the Greek and Roman empires to present day have allowed bureaucrats to usurp the power of the law and to spend tax dollars as they see fit answering only if there is an audit and even if they are found to misappropriate funds there are lots of loop holes for them to jump through.

    My question is why.

    It was brought to my attention, that in the bureaucracy of law enforcement that the fines levied against law breakers, be they traffic law breakers or code enforcement law brakes or criminal can be used to fund the court officials retirement fund. Who wrote that law? There are many administrative code pollicis, administrated by the social bureaucrats that waste enormous amounts of money on useless or redundant studies that give their cohorts and their cohorts children a summer job. What law maker agreed to that.

    Some of the most egregious abuses of bureaucracies misuse of their power, have been against the Native people of this country. The Bureau of Indian Affairs office was charged with managing the resources, put aside for the benefit of the indigenous people, who’s land and resources were confiscated by this government. It was only when a few of these people took maters into their own hands and started managing, what resources they could wrest from the bureaucrats, their own affairs did they start to rise out of the poverty that they had been relegated too.

    Our government was crafted with the intent that the people should be self governing. We can only self govern if we can get the facts. Have you ever tried to get the true facts from a bureaucrat.

    I don’t care what the intent or purpose of this branch of the bureaucracy is my question is do we really need it?

    Reply



Tell us what you think.

Let the world know what you think, but please do so responsibly. Comments are moderated and we will not post personal attacks, obscene language or inappropriate material, comments with links, or comments from people under the age of 18. If you have a question, check out our Comment Submission Guidelines.

why are we asking for this?

By clicking submit, you agree to our site’s Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.



Related ///

The Wolf Man

Field biologist Doug Smith studies Yellowstone’s restored predators. “Nature without wolves is not nature,” he says.

Europe Deems 2014 the Year Against Food Waste

Should we take waste stats more seriously?

Second Line

Directed by Danny Glover, one man’s journey from indifference to understanding.

Second Line

A Champion for Homeless Pets

The founder of The Best Friends Animal Society explains the origins of the “no kill movement” and his continued efforts to help homeless animals.

Should Cursive Be Saved?

Cursive handwriting is disappearing from schools. Do we have a responsibility to save it?

Should Cursive Be Saved?

Is Yoga Bad for You?

A new debate has taken hold over yoga’s health benefits, or lack thereof.




About Liberty Mutual

Liberty Mutual is a provider of auto, home, and life insurance for consumers, as well as risk and disability products and services for businesses. Because responsibility is integral to who we are, we also support a range of community service programs around issues like fire safety and responsible sports. Through the Liberty Mutual Foundation, we make grants to organizations that show low-income students a path to lifelong success through education, and agencies that provide immediate basic health and human services to the needy. To learn more about us, visit us at LibertyMutualGroup.com

© 2012 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 175 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116